A second dose of kisspeptin-54 improves oocyte maturation in women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a Phase 2 randomized controlled trial

A Abbara, S Clarke, R Islam, JK Prague… - Human …, 2017 - academic.oup.com
A Abbara, S Clarke, R Islam, JK Prague, AN Comninos, S Narayanaswamy…
Human Reproduction, 2017academic.oup.com
STUDY QUESTION Can increasing the duration of LH-exposure with a second dose of
kisspeptin-54 improve oocyte maturation in women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation
syndrome (OHSS)? SUMMARY ANSWER A second dose of kisspeptin-54 at 10 h following
the first improves oocyte yield in women at high risk of OHSS. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Kisspeptin acts at the hypothalamus to stimulate the release of an endogenous pool of
GnRH from the hypothalamus. We have previously reported that a single dose of kisspeptin …
STUDY QUESTION
Can increasing the duration of LH-exposure with a second dose of kisspeptin-54 improve oocyte maturation in women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)?
SUMMARY ANSWER
A second dose of kisspeptin-54 at 10 h following the first improves oocyte yield in women at high risk of OHSS.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Kisspeptin acts at the hypothalamus to stimulate the release of an endogenous pool of GnRH from the hypothalamus. We have previously reported that a single dose of kisspeptin-54 results in an LH-surge of ~12–14 h duration, which safely triggers oocyte maturation in women at high risk of OHSS.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
Phase-2 randomized placebo-controlled trial of 62 women at high risk of OHSS recruited between August 2015 and May 2016. Following controlled ovarian stimulation, all patients (n = 62) received a subcutaneous injection of kisspeptin-54 (9.6 nmol/kg) 36 h prior to oocyte retrieval. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either a second dose of kisspeptin-54 (D; Double, n = 31), or saline (S; Single, n = 31) 10 h thereafter. Patients, embryologists, and IVF clinicians remained blinded to the dosing allocation.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Study participants: Sixty-two women aged 18–34 years at high risk of OHSS (antral follicle count ≥23 or anti-Mullerian hormone level ≥40 pmol/L).
Setting: Single centre study carried out at Hammersmith Hospital IVF unit, London, UK.
Primary outcome: Proportion of patients achieving an oocyte yield (percentage of mature oocytes retrieved from follicles ≥14 mm on morning of first kisspeptin-54 trigger administration) of at least 60%.
Secondary outcomes: Reproductive hormone levels, implantation rate and OHSS occurrence.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
A second dose of kisspeptin-54 at 10 h following the first induced further LH-secretion at 4 h after administration. A higher proportion of patients achieved an oocyte yield ≥60% following a second dose of kisspeptin-54 (Single: 14/31, 45%, Double: 21/31, 71%; absolute difference +26%, CI 2–50%, P = 0.042).
Patients receiving two doses of kisspeptin-54 had a variable LH-response following the second kisspeptin dose, which appeared to be dependent on the LH-response following the first kisspeptin injection. Patients who had a lower LH-rise following the first dose of kisspeptin had a more substantial ‘rescue’ LH-response following the second dose of kisspeptin. The variable LH-response following the second dose of kisspeptin resulted in a greater proportion of patients achieving an oocyte yield ≥60%, but without also increasing the frequency of ovarian over-response and moderate OHSS (Single: 1/31, 3.2%, Double: 0/31, 0%).
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
Further studies are warranted to directly compare kisspeptin-54 to more established triggers of oocyte maturation.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
Triggering final oocyte maturation with kisspeptin is a novel therapeutic option to enable the use of fresh embryo transfer even in the woman at high risk of OHSS.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
The study was designed, conducted, analysed and reported entirely by the authors. The Medical Research Council (MRC), Wellcome Trust & National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) provided research funding to carry out the studies. There are no competing interests to …
Oxford University Press